Blog
World population
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In demographics and general statistics, the term world population refers to the total number of living humans on Earth. The United States Census Bureau estimates that the world population exceeded 7 billion on March 12, 2012.[1] According to a separate estimate by the United Nations Population Fund, it reached this milestone on October 31, 2011.[2][3][4] In July 2015, the Population Division of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs estimated the world population at approximately 7.3 billion.[5]
The world population has experienced continuous growth since the end of the Great Famine and the Black Death in 1350, when it was near 370 million.[6] The highest growth rates – global population increases above 1.8% per year – occurred briefly during the 1950s, and for longer during the 1960s and 1970s. The global growth rate peaked at 2.2% in 1963, and has declined to 1.1% as of 2012[update].[7] Total annual births were highest in the late 1980s at about 139 million,[8] and are now expected to remain essentially constant at their 2011 level of 135 million,[9] while deaths number 56 million per year, and are expected to increase to 80 million per year by 2040.[10]
The 2012 UN projections show a continued increase in population in the near future with a steady decline in population growth rate; the global population is expected to reach between 8.3 and 10.9 billion by 2050.[11][12] 2003 UN Population Division population projections for the year 2150 range between 3.2 and 24.8 billion.[13] One of many independent mathematical models supports the lower estimate,[14] while a 2014 estimate forecasts between 9.3 and 12.6 billion in 2100, and continued growth thereafter.[15][16] Some analysts have questioned the sustainability of further world population growth, highlighting the growing pressures on the environment, global food supplies, and energy resources.[17][18][19]
Various scholarly estimates have been made of the total number of humans who have ever lived, giving figures ranging from approximately 100 billion to 115 billion.[20][21]
Contents
- 1 Population by region
- 1.1 Population by continent
- 2 History
- 2.1 Antiquity and Middle Ages
- 2.2 Modern era
- 2.3 Milestones by the billions
- 3 Global demographics
- 4 Largest populations by country
- 4.1 Most densely populated countries
- 5 Fluctuation
- 5.1 Projections
- 5.2 Population growth by region
- 6 Mathematical approximations
- 6.1 Years for world population to double
- 7 Overpopulation
- 7.1 Predictions of scarcity
- 7.2 Environmental impacts
- 7.3 Population control
- 7.4 Overpopulation as a myth
- 8 Number of humans who have ever lived
- 8.1 Estimation methodologies
- Population by region
Six of Earth’s seven continents are permanently inhabited on a large scale. Asia is the most populous continent, with its 4.3 billion inhabitants accounting for 60% of the world population. The world’s two most populated countries alone, China and India, together constitute about 37% of the world’s population. Africa is the second most populated continent, with around 1 billion people, or 15% of the world’s population. Europe‘s 733 million people make up 12% of the world’s population as of 2012, while the Latin American and Caribbean regions are home to around 600 million (9%). Northern America, primarily consisting of the United States and Canada, has a population of around 352 million (5%), and Oceania, the least-populated region, has about 35 million inhabitants (0.5%).[23] Though it is not permanently inhabited by any fixed population, Antarctica has a small, fluctuating international population, based mainly in polar science stations. This population tends to rise in the summer months and decrease significantly in winter, as visiting researchers return to their home countries.[24]
1.1 Population by continent
World population (millions)[22] | ||||
# | Top ten most populous countries | 1990 | 2008 | 2025* |
1 | China | 1,141 | 1,333 | 1,458 |
2 | India | 849 | 1,140 | 1,398 |
3 | United States | 250 | 304 | 352 |
4 | Indonesia | 178 | 228 | 273 |
5 | Brazil | 150 | 192 | 223 |
6 | Pakistan | 108 | 166 | 226 |
7 | Bangladesh | 116 | 160 | 198 |
8 | Nigeria | 94 | 151 | 208 |
9 | Russia | 149 | 143 | 137 |
10 | Japan | 124 | 128 | 126 |
World total | 5,267 | 6,689 | 8,004 | |
Top ten most populous (%) | 60.0% | 58.9% | 57.5% | |
1 | Asia | 1,613 | 2,183 | 2,693 |
+ China | 1,141 | 1,333 | 1,458 | |
+ OECD Pacific* | 187 | 202 | 210 | |
2 | Africa | 634 | 984 | 1,365 |
3 | Europe* | 564 | 603 | 659 |
+ Russia | 149 | 143 | 137 | |
+ 11 Post-Soviet Republics* | 134 | 136 | 146 | |
4 | Latin America | 355 | 462 | 550 |
5 | North America* | 359 | 444 | 514 |
6 | Middle East | 132 | 199 | 272 |
Australia | 17 | 22 | 28 | |
Continent | Density (inhabitants/km2) | Population (millions, 2013 estimates) | Most populous country | Most populous city (metropolitan area) |
Asia | 96.4 | 4,298 | China (1,361,000,000)[25] | Greater Tokyo Area (35,676,000) |
Africa | 36.7 | 1,111 | Nigeria (178,517,000) | Lagos (21,000,000) |
Europe | 72.9 | 742 | Russia (143,700,000; approx. 110 million in Europe) | Moscow (19,468,664) |
North America[26] | 22.9 | 565 | United States (317,996,000) | Mexico City/Metro Area (8,851,080 / 21,163,226) |
South America | 22.8 | 407 | Brazil (201,032,714) | São Paulo City/Metro Area (11,316,149 / 27,640,577) |
Oceania | 4.5 | 38 | Australia (23,475,992) | Sydney (4,757,083) |
Antarctica | 0.0003 (varies) | 0.004 in summer (non-permanent, varies)[24] | N/A[note 1] | McMurdo Station (1,200) (non-permanent, varies) |
- History
See also: World population estimates and History of the world
2.1 Antiquity and Middle Ages
Main articles: Classical demography and Medieval demography
The population may have been around 15 million after the time agriculture emerged in around 10,000 BCE.[27] By contrast, it is estimated that around 50–60 million people lived in the combined eastern and western Roman Empire in the 4th century CE.[28]
The Plague of Justinian, which first emerged during the reign of the Roman emperor Justinian, caused Europe’s population to drop by around 50% between the 6th and 8th centuries CE.[29] The population of Europe was more than 70 million in 1340.[30] The Black Death pandemic of the 14th century may have reduced the world’s population from an estimated 450 million in 1340 to between 350 and 375 million in 1400;[31] it took 200 years for population figures to recover.[32] The population of China decreased from 123 million in 1200 to 65 million in 1393,[33] which was presumably due to a combination of Mongol invasions, famine, and plague.[34]
At the founding of the Ming Dynasty in 1368, China’s population was reported to be close to 60 million; toward the end of the dynasty in 1644, it may have approached 150 million.[35] England’s population reached an estimated 5.6 million in 1650, up from an estimated 2.6 million in 1500.[36] New crops that were brought to Asia and Europe from the Americas by Spanish colonists in the 16th century are believed to have contributed to population growth.[37][38] Since their introduction to Africa by Portuguese traders in the 16th century,[39] maize and cassava have similarly replaced traditional African crops as the most important staple food crops grown on the continent.[40]
Around 300 BCE, the population of India was between 100 million and 140 million.[41] The population of India in 1600 was around 100 million. Hence, from 300 BCE to 1600, India’s population was more or less stable.[42]
The pre-Columbian North American population probably numbered somewhere between 2 million and 18 million.[43] Encounters between European explorers and populations in the rest of the world often introduced local epidemics of extraordinary virulence.[44] According to the most extreme scholarly claims, as many as 90% of the Native American population of the New World died due to Old World diseases such as smallpox, measles and influenza.[45] Over the centuries, the Europeans had developed high degrees of immunity to these diseases, while the indigenous peoples had no such immunity.[46]
2.2 Modern era
Map showing urban areas with at least one million inhabitants in 2006. Only 3% of the world’s population lived in cities in 1800; this proportion had risen to 47% by 2000, and reached 50.5% by 2010.[47] By 2050, the proportion may reach 70%.[48]
During the European Agricultural and Industrial Revolutions, the life expectancy of children increased dramatically.[49] The percentage of the children born in London who died before the age of five decreased from 74.5% in 1730–1749 to 31.8% in 1810–1829.[50][51] Between 1700 and 1900, Europe’s population increased from about 100 million to over 400 million.[52] Altogether, the areas populated by people of European descent comprised 36% of the world’s population in 1900.[53]
Population growth in the West became more rapid after the introduction of vaccination and other improvements in medicine and sanitation.[54] Improved material conditions led to the population of Britain increasing from 10 million to 40 million in the 19th century.[55] The population of the United Kingdom reached 60 million in 2006.[56] The United States saw its population grow from around 5.3 million in 1800 to 106 million in 1920, exceeding 307 million in 2010.[57]
The first half of the 20th century in Imperial Russia and the Soviet Union was marked by a succession of major wars, famines and other disasters which caused large-scale population losses (approximately 60 million excess deaths).[58][59] After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia’s population declined significantly – from 150 million in 1991 to 143 million in 2012[60] – but by 2013 this decline appeared to have halted.[61]
Many countries in the developing world have experienced extremely rapid population growth since the early 20th century, due to economic development and improvements in public health. China’s population rose from approximately 430 million in 1850 to 580 million in 1953,[62] and now stands at over 1.3 billion. The population of the Indian subcontinent, which was about 125 million in 1750, increased to 389 million in 1941;[63] today, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh are collectively home to about 1.5 billion people.[64] Java had about 5 million inhabitants in 1815; its present-day successor, Indonesia, now has a population of over 140 million.[65] Mexico’s population grew from 13.6 million in 1900 to about 112 million in 2010.[66][67] Between the 1920s and 2000s, Kenya’s population grew from 2.9 million to 37 million.[68]
2.3 Milestones by the billions
Main article: World population milestones
World population milestones (USCB estimates)[69] | |||||||||
Population (in billions) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Year | 1804 | 1927 | 1959 | 1974 | 1987 | 1999 | 2011 | 2024 | 2037 |
Years elapsed between milestones | – | 123 | 32 | 15 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 |
It is estimated that the world population reached one billion for the first time in 1804. It was another 123 years before it reached two billion in 1927, but it took only 33 years to reach three billion in 1960.[70] Thereafter, the global population reached four billion in 1974, five billion in 1987, six billion in 1999 and, according to the United States Census Bureau, seven billion in March 2012.[69] The United Nations, however, estimated that the world population reached seven billion in October 2011.[2][3][4]
According to current projections, the global population will reach eight billion by 2024, and will likely reach around nine billion by 2037. Alternative scenarios for 2050 range from a low of 7.4 billion to a high of more than 10.6 billion.[71] Projected figures vary depending on underlying statistical assumptions and the variables used in projection calculations, especially the fertility variable. Long-range predictions to 2150 range from a population decline to 3.2 billion in the “low scenario”, to “high scenarios” of 24.8 billion.[71] One extreme scenario predicted a massive increase to 256 billion by 2150, assuming the global fertility rate remained at its 1995 level of 3.04 children per woman; however, by 2010 the global fertility rate had declined to 2.52.[13][72]
There is no estimation for the exact day or month the world’s population surpassed one or two billion. The points at which it reached three and four billion were not officially noted, but the International Database of the United States Census Bureau placed them in July 1959 and April 1974 respectively. The United Nations did determine, and celebrate, the “Day of 5 Billion” on July 11, 1987, and the “Day of 6 Billion” on October 12, 1999. The “Day of 7 Billion” was declared by the Population Division of the United Nations to be October 31, 2011.[73]
- Global demographics
Main article: Demographics of the world
2012 map showing average life expectancy by country in years. In 2012, the World Health Organization estimated the average global life expectancy as 70.5 years.[74]
80+ (dark blue)
77.5+ (mid blue) 75+ (light blue) 72.5+ (dark green) 70+(mid green) 67.5+ (light green) 65+ (yellow) | 60+ (mustard)
55+ (orange) 50+ (bright red) 45+ (dark red) 40+ (brown) less than 40 (black) |
As of 2012, the global sex ratio is approximately 1.01 males to 1 female. The greater number of men is possibly due to the significant gender imbalances evident in the Indian and Chinese populations.[75][76] Approximately 26.3% of the global population is aged under 15, while 65.9% is aged 15–64 and 7.9% is aged 65 or over.[75] The median age of the world’s population was estimated to be 29.7 years in 2014,[77] and is expected to rise to 37.9 years by 2050.[78]
According to the World Health Organization, the global average life expectancy is 70.5 years as of 2012, with women living an average of 73 years and men approximately 68 years.[74] In 2010, the global fertility rate was estimated at 2.52 children per woman.[72] In June 2012, British researchers calculated the total weight of Earth’s human population as approximately 287 million tonnes, with the average person weighing around 62 kilograms (137 lb).[79]
The nominal 2013 gross world product was estimated at US$74.31 trillion by the CIA, giving an annual global per capita figure of around US$10,500.[80] Around 1.29 billion people (18.4% of the world population) live in extreme poverty, subsisting on less than US$1.25 per day;[81] approximately 870 million people (12.25%) are undernourished.[82] 83% of the world’s over-15s are considered literate.[75] In June 2014, there were around 3.03 billion global Internet users, constituting 42.3% of the world population.[83]
The Han Chinese are the world’s largest single ethnic group, constituting over 19% of the global population in 2011.[84] The world’s most-spoken first languages are Mandarin Chinese (spoken by 12.44% of the world’s population), Spanish (4.85%), English (4.83%), Arabic (3.25%) and Hindustani (2.68%).[75] The world’s largest religion is Christianity, whose adherents account for 33.35% of the global population; Islam is the second-largest religion, accounting for 22.43%, and Hinduism the third, accounting for 13.78%.[75] In 2005, around 16% of the global population were reported to be non-religious.[85]
- Largest populations by country
Further information: List of countries by population
A map of the world’s countries by total population, with darker shading indicating larger populations.
10 most populous countries | |||||
Rank | Country / Territory | Population | Date | Approx. % of world population | Source |
1 | China[note 2] | 1,372,070,000 | September 14, 2015 | 18.9% | [86] |
2 | India | 1,277,100,000 | September 14, 2015 | 17.6% | [87] |
3 | United States | 321,820,000 | September 14, 2015 | 4.43% | [88] |
4 | Indonesia | 252,164,800 | July 1, 2014 | 3.47% | [89] |
5 | Brazil | 204,897,000 | September 14, 2015 | 2.82% | [90] |
6 | Pakistan | 190,905,000 | September 14, 2015 | 2.63% | [91] |
7 | Nigeria | 173,615,000 | January 1, 2014 | 2.39% | [92] |
8 | Bangladesh | 159,022,000 | September 14, 2015 | 2.19% | [93] |
9 | Russia | 146,068,400 | June 1, 2014 | 2.01% | [94] |
10 | Japan | 127,130,000 | August 1, 2014 | 1.75% | [95] |
Approximately 4.231 billion people live in these ten countries, representing around 58% of the world’s population as of August 2014. Approximately 3.7 billion people, or half of the world population, live in the six most populous countries.[96]
4.1 Most densely populated countries
Further information: List of countries and dependencies by population density
The tables below list the world’s most densely populated countries, both in absolute terms and in comparison to their total populations.
Population density (people per km2) map of the world in 1994. Red and pink areas denote regions of highest population density.
10 most densely populated countries / regions (with population above 1 million) | ||||
Rank | Country / Region | Population | Area (km2) | Density (Pop. per km2) |
1 | Singapore | 5,399,200 | 710 | 7605 |
2 | Bahrain | 1,234,571 | 750 | 1646 |
3 | Bangladesh | 149,772,364 | 147,570 | 1101 |
4 | Taiwan | 23,361,147 | 36,190 | 645 |
5 | Mauritius | 1,257,900 | 2,040 | 617 |
6 | South Korea | 50,219,669 | 99,538 | 505 |
7 | Lebanon | 4,822,000 | 10,452 | 461 |
8 | Netherlands[97] | 16,911,719 | 41,526 | 407 |
9 | Rwanda | 10,537,222 | 26,338 | 400 |
10 | Haiti | 10,413,211 | 27,065 | 385 |
Countries / regions ranking highly in terms of both total population (more than 15 million people) and population density (more than 250 people per square kilometer): | ||||
Country / Region | Population | Area (km2) | Density (Pop. per km2) | Notes |
India | 1,277,100,000 | 3,287,240 | 389 | Growing country |
Bangladesh | 149,772,364 | 147,570 | 1101 | Slowly growing country |
Japan | 127,180,000 | 377,873 | 337 | Declining in population[98] |
Philippines | 98,698,000 | 300,076 | 329 | Growing country |
Vietnam | 90,388,000 | 331,689 | 268 | Growing country |
United Kingdom | 63,705,000 | 243,610 | 262 | Slowly growing country |
South Korea | 50,219,669 | 99,538 | 505 | Slowly growing country[99] |
Taiwan | 23,361,147 | 36,190 | 645 | Steady in population |
Sri Lanka | 20,328,597 | 65,610 | 309 | Slowly growing country |
Netherlands | 16,848,208 | 41,526 | 406 | Steady in population[100] |
- Fluctuation
Main article: Population growth
Estimates of population evolution in different continents between 1950 and 2050, according to the United Nations. The vertical axis is logarithmic and is in millions of people.
Population size fluctuates at differing rates in differing regions. Nonetheless, population growth is the long-standing trend on all inhabited continents, as well as in most individual states. During the 20th century, the global population saw its greatest increase in known history, rising from about 1.6 billion in 1900 to over 6 billion in 2000. This increase was due to a number of factors, including the lessening of the mortality rate in many countries by improved sanitation and medical advances, and a massive increase in agricultural productivity attributed to the Green Revolution.[101][102][103]
In 2000, the United Nations estimated that the world’s population was growing at an annual rate of 1.14% (equivalent to around 75 million people),[104] down from a peak of 88 million per year in 1989. By 2000, there were approximately ten times as many people on Earth as there had been in 1700. Globally, the population growth rate has been steadily declining from its peak of 2.19% in 1963, but growth remains high in Latin America, the Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa.[105]
A world map showing global variations in fertility rate per woman, according to the CIA World Factbook‘s 2015 data.
7–8 children (purple)
6–7 children (pink) | 5–6 children (red)
4–5 children (orange) | 3–4 children (yellow)
2–3 children (green) | 1–2 children (light blue)
0–1 children (dark blue) |
In some countries, there is negative population growth (i.e. a net decrease in population over time), especially in Europe – this is mainly due to low fertility rates. During the 2010s, Japan and some countries in Europe began to encounter negative population growth, due to sub-replacement fertility rates.[98]
In 2006, the United Nations stated that the rate of population growth was visibly diminishing due to the ongoing global demographic transition. If this trend continues, the rate of growth may diminish to zero by 2050, concurrent with a world population plateau of 9.2 billion.[106] However, this is only one of many estimates published by the UN; in 2009, UN population projections for 2050 ranged between around 8 billion and 10.5 billion.[107] An alternative scenario is given by the statistician Jorgen Randers, who argues that traditional projections insufficiently take into account the downward impact of global urbanization on fertility. Randers’ “most likely scenario” reveals a peak in the world population in the early 2040s at about 8.1 billion people, followed by decline.[108]
Estimated world population figures, 10,000 BCE–2000 CE.
Estimated world population figures, 10,000 BC–2000 CE (in log y scale).
World population figures, 1950–2000.
Estimated global growth rates, 1950–2050.
Estimated and projected populations of the world and its continents (except Antarctica) from 1950 to 2100. The shaded regions correspond to the range of projections by the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
5.1 Projections
Main articles: World population estimates and Projections of population growth
Long-term global population growth is difficult to predict. The United Nations and the US Census Bureau both give different estimates – according to the UN, the world population reached seven billion in late 2011,[109] while the USCB asserted that this occurred in March 2012.[110] The UN has issued multiple projections of future world population, based on different assumptions. From 2000 to 2005, the UN consistently revised these projections downward, until the 2006 revision, issued on March 14, 2007, revised the 2050 mid-range estimate upwards by 273 million.
Average global birth rates are declining fast, but vary greatly between developed countries (where birth rates are often at or below replacement levels) and developing countries (where birth rates typically remain high). Different ethnicities also display varying birth rates. Death rates can change rapidly due to disease epidemics, wars and other mass catastrophes, or advances in medicine.
UN (medium variant – 2012 revision) and US Census Bureau (June 2015) estimates[111][112] | ||||
Year | UN est. (millions) | Difference | USCB est. (millions) | Difference |
2005 | 6,514 | – | 6,474 | – |
2010 | 6,916 | 402 | 6,866 | 392 |
2015 | 7,324 | 408 | 7,253 | 387 |
2020 | 7,717 | 393 | 7,631 | 378 |
2025 | 8,083 | 366 | 7,987 | 356 |
2030 | 8,425 | 342 | 8,316 | 329 |
2035 | 8,743 | 318 | 8,619 | 303 |
2040 | 9,039 | 296 | 8,897 | 278 |
2045 | 9,308 | 269 | 9,150 | 253 |
2050 | 9,551 | 243 | 9,376 | 227 |
UN 2012 estimates and medium variant projections (in millions)[111] | |||||||
Year | World | Asia | Africa | Europe | Latin America/Caribbean | Northern America | Oceania |
2010 | 6,916 | 4,165 (60.2%) | 1,031 (14.9%) | 740 (10.7%) | 596 (8.6%) | 347 (5.0%) | 37 (0.5%) |
2015 | 7,324 | 4,385 (59.9%) | 1,166 (15.9%) | 743 (10.1%) | 630 (8.6%) | 361 (4.9%) | 39 (0.5%) |
2020 | 7,717 | 4,582 (59.4%) | 1,312 (17.0%) | 744 (9.6%) | 662 (8.6%) | 376 (4.9%) | 42 (0.5%) |
2025 | 8,083 | 4,749 (58.8%) | 1,468 (18.2%) | 741 (10.1%) | 691 (9.2%) | 390 (4.8%) | 45 (0.6%) |
2030 | 8,425 | 4,887 (58.0%) | 1,634 (19.4%) | 736 (8.7%) | 717 (8.5%) | 403 (4.8%) | 47 (0.6%) |
2035 | 8,743 | 4,997 (57.2%) | 1,812 (20.7%) | 730 (8.3%) | 739 (8.5%) | 415 (4.8%) | 50 (0.6%) |
2040 | 9,039 | 5,080 (56.2%) | 1,999 (22.1%) | 724 (8.0%) | 757 (8.4%) | 426 (4.8%) | 52 (0.6%) |
2045 | 9,308 | 5,136 (55.2%) | 2,194 (23.6%) | 717 (7.7%) | 771 (8.3%) | 436 (4.7%) | 55 (0.6%) |
2050 | 9,551 | 5,164 (54.1%) | 2,393 (25.1%) | 709 (7.4%) | 782 (8.2%) | 446 (4.7%) | 57 (0.6%) |
2055 | 9,766 | 5,168 (52.9%) | 2,595 (26.6%) | 700 (7.2%) | 788 (8.1%) | 456 (4.7%) | 59 (0.6%) |
2060 | 9,957 | 5,152 (51.7%) | 2,797 (28.1%) | 691 (6.9%) | 791 (7.9%) | 465 (4.7%) | 61 (0.6%) |
2065 | 10,127 | 5,120 (50.6%) | 2,998 (29.6%) | 681 (6.7%) | 791 (7.8%) | 474 (4.7%) | 63 (0.6%) |
2070 | 10,277 | 5,075 (49.4%) | 3,195 (31.1%) | 673 (6.5%) | 788 (7.6%) | 482 (4.7%) | 64 (0.6%) |
2075 | 10,409 | 5,019 (48.2%) | 3,387 (32.5%) | 665 (6.4%) | 783 (7.5%) | 490 (4.7%) | 66 (0.6%) |
2080 | 10,524 | 4,957 (47.1%) | 3,570 (33.9%) | 659 (6.3%) | 776 (7.4%) | 496 (4.7%) | 67 (0.6%) |
2085 | 10,626 | 4,894 (46.1%) | 3,742 (35.2%) | 653 (6.1%) | 767 (7.2%) | 502 (4.7%) | 68 (0.6%) |
2090 | 10,717 | 4,833 (45.1%) | 3,903 (36.4%) | 649 (6.1%) | 757 (7.1%) | 506 (4.7%) | 69 (0.6%) |
2095 | 10,794 | 4,773 (44.2%) | 4,051 (37.6%) | 644 (6.0%) | 747 (6.9%) | 510 (4.7%) | 69 (0.6%) |
2100 | 10,854 | 4,712 (43.4%) | 4,185 (38.6%) | 639 (5.9%) | 736 (6.8%) | 513 (4.7%) | 70 (0.6%) |
5.2 Population growth by region
The table below shows historical and predicted regional population figures in millions.[109][113][114] The availability of historical population figures varies by region.
World historical and predicted populations (in millions)[115][116] | ||||||||||||||
Region | 1500 | 1600 | 1700 | 1750 | 1800 | 1850 | 1900 | 1950 | 1999 | 2008 | 2010 | 2012 | 2050 | 2150 |
World | 458 | 580 | 682 | 791 | 978 | 1,262 | 1,650 | 2,521 | 5,978 | 6,707 | 6,896 | 7,052 | 8,909 | 9,746 |
Africa | 86 | 114 | 106 | 106 | 107 | 111 | 133 | 221 | 767 | 973 | 1,022 | 1,052 | 1,766 | 2,308 |
Asia | 243 | 339 | 436 | 502 | 635 | 809 | 947 | 1,402 | 3,634 | 4,054 | 4,164 | 4,250 | 5,268 | 5,561 |
Europe | 84 | 111 | 125 | 163 | 203 | 276 | 408 | 547 | 729 | 732 | 738 | 740 | 628 | 517 |
Latin America[Note 1] | 39 | 10 | 10 | 16 | 24 | 38 | 74 | 167 | 511 | 577 | 590 | 603 | 809 | 912 |
Northern America[Note 1] | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 26 | 82 | 172 | 307 | 337 | 345 | 351 | 392 | 398 |
Oceania | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 30 | 34 | 37 | 38 | 46 | 51 |
World historical and predicted populations by percentage distribution[115][116] | ||||||||||||||
Region | 1500 | 1600 | 1700 | 1750 | 1800 | 1850 | 1900 | 1950 | 1999 | 2008 | 2010 | 2012 | 2050 | 2150 |
World | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Africa | 18.8 | 19.7 | 15.5 | 13.4 | 10.9 | 8.8 | 8.1 | 8.8 | 12.8 | 14.5 | 14.8 | 15.2 | 19.8 | 23.7 |
Asia | 53.1 | 58.4 | 63.9 | 63.5 | 64.9 | 64.1 | 57.4 | 55.6 | 60.8 | 60.4 | 60.4 | 60.3 | 59.1 | 57.1 |
Europe | 18.3 | 19.1 | 18.3 | 20.6 | 20.8 | 21.9 | 24.7 | 21.7 | 12.2 | 10.9 | 10.7 | 10.5 | 7.0 | 5.3 |
Latin America[Note 1] | 8.5 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 6.6 | 8.5 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 9.1 | 9.4 |
Northern America[Note 1] | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 5.0 | 6.8 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.4 | 4.1 |
Oceania | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Note: in the table below, the figures for North America only refer to post-European contact settlers, and not native populations from before European settlement.
Estimated world and regional populations at various dates (in millions) | ||||||||
Year | World | Africa | Asia | Europe | Latin America[Note 1] | Northern America[Note 1] | Oceania | Notes |
70,000 BCE | < 0.015 | [117] | ||||||
10,000 BCE | 4 | [118] | ||||||
8000 BCE | 5 | |||||||
6500 BCE | 5 | |||||||
5000 BCE | 5 | |||||||
4000 BCE | 7 | |||||||
3000 BCE | 14 | |||||||
2000 BCE | 27 | |||||||
1000 BCE | 50 | 7 | 33 | 9 | [citation needed] | |||
500 BCE | 100 | 14 | 66 | 16 | ||||
CE 1 | 200 | 23 | 141 | 28 | ||||
1000 | 400 | 70 | 269 | 50 | 8 | 1 | 2 | |
1750 | 791 | 106 | 502 | 163 | 16 | 2 | 2 | |
1800 | 1,000 | 107 | 656 | 203 | 24 | 7 | 3 | |
1850 | 1,262 | 111 | 809 | 276 | 38 | 26 | 2 | |
1900 | 1,650 | 133 | 947 | 408 | 74 | 82 | 6 | |
1950 | 2,519 | 221 | 1,398 | 547 | 167 | 172 | 12.8 | [119] |
1955 | 2,756 | 247 | 1,542 | 575 | 191 | 187 | 14.3 | |
1960 | 2,982 | 277 | 1,674 | 601 | 209 | 204 | 15.9 | |
1965 | 3,335 | 314 | 1,899 | 634 | 250 | 219 | 17.6 | |
1970 | 3,692 | 357 | 2,143 | 656 | 285 | 232 | 19.4 | |
1975 | 4,068 | 408 | 2,397 | 675 | 322 | 243 | 21.5 | |
1980 | 4,435 | 470 | 2,632 | 692 | 361 | 256 | 22.8 | |
1985 | 4,831 | 542 | 2,887 | 706 | 401 | 269 | 24.7 | |
1990 | 5,263 | 622 | 3,168 | 721 | 441 | 283 | 26.7 | |
1995 | 5,674 | 707 | 3,430 | 727 | 481 | 299 | 28.9 | |
2000 | 6,070 | 796 | 3,680 | 728 | 520 | 316 | 31.0 | |
2005 | 6,454 | 888 | 3,917 | 725 | 558 | 332 | 32.9 | |
2010 | 6,972 | 1,022 | 4,252 | 732 | 580 | 351 | 35.6 |
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Northern America comprises the northern-most countries and territories of North America: Canada, the United States, Greenland, Bermuda, and Pierre and Miquelon. Latin America comprises Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean and South America.
- Mathematical approximations
In 1975, Sebastian von Hoerner proposed a formula for population growth which represented hyperbolic growth with an infinite population in 2025.[121] The hyperbolic growth of the world population observed until the 1970s was later correlated to a non-linear second order positive feedback between demographic growth and technological development. This feedback can be described as follows: technological advance → increase in the carrying capacity of land for people → demographic growth → more people → more potential inventors → acceleration of technological advance → accelerating growth of the carrying capacity → faster population growth → accelerating growth of the number of potential inventors → faster technological advance → hence, the faster growth of the Earth’s carrying capacity for people, and so on.[122] The transition from hyperbolic growth to slower rates of growth is related to the demographic transition.
According to the Russian demographer Sergey Kapitsa,[123] the world population grew between 67,000 BCE and 1965 according to the following formula:
where
- N is current population
- T is the current year
- C = (1.86±0.01)·1011
- T0 = 2007±1
- = 42±1
6.1 Years for world population to double
According linear interpolation and extrapolation of UNDESA population estimates, the world population has doubled, or will double, in the years listed in the tables below (with two different starting points). During the 2nd millennium CE, each doubling took roughly half as long as the previous doubling, fitting the hyperbolic growth model mentioned above. However, after 2025 it is unlikely that there will be another doubling of the global population in the 21st century.[124]
Historic chart showing the periods of time the world population has taken to double, from 1700 to 2000.
Starting at 500 million | ||||||||||
Population (in billions) | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | |||||
Year | 1500 | 1804 | 1927 | 1974 | 2025 | |||||
Years elapsed | 304 | 123 | 47 | 51 | ||||||
Starting at 375 million | ||||||||||
Population (in billions) | 0.375 | 0.75 | 1.5 | 3 | 6 | |||||
Year | 1171 | 1715 | 1881 | 1960 | 1999 | |||||
Years elapsed | 544 | 166 | 79 | 39 | ||||||
- Overpopulation
Main articles: Human overpopulation and Malthusian catastrophe
7.1 Predictions of scarcity
Greater Los Angeles lies on a coastal mediterranean savannah with a small watershed that is able to support at most one million people on its own water; as of 2015, the area has a population of over 18 million. Researchers predict that similar cases of resource scarcity will grow more common as the world population increases.[125]
In his 1798 work An Essay on the Principle of Population, the British scholar Thomas Malthus incorrectly predicted that continued population growth would exhaust the global food supply by the mid-19th century. The essay was written to refute what Malthus considered the unattainable utopian ideas of William Godwin and Marquis de Condorcet, as presented in Political Justice and The Future Progress of the Human Mind. In 1968, Paul R. Ehrlich reprised Malthus’ argument in The Population Bomb, predicting that mass global famine would occur in the 1970s and 1980s.[126]
The predictions of Ehrlich and other neo-Malthusians were vigorously challenged by a number of economists, notably Julian Lincoln Simon, and advances in agriculture, collectively known as the Green Revolution, forestalled any potential global famine in the late 20th century. Between 1950 and 1984, as the Green Revolution transformed agriculture around the world, grain production increased by over 250%.[127] The world population has grown by over four billion since the beginning of the Green Revolution, but food production has so far kept pace with population growth. Most scholars believe that, without the Revolution, there would be greater levels of famine and malnutrition than the UN presently documents.[128] However, neo-Malthusians point out that the energy for the Green Revolution was provided by fossil fuels, in the form of natural gas-derived fertilizers, oil-derived pesticides, and hydrocarbon-fueled irrigation, and that many crops have become so genetically uniform that a crop failure in any one country could potentially have global repercussions.[129]
In 2004, a meta-analysis of 70 quantitative studies estimating a sustainable limit to the world population generated a meta-estimate of 7.7 billion people.[130]
Graph of the global human population from 10,000 BCE to 2000 CE, from the US Census Bureau. The graph shows the extremely rapid growth in the world population that has taken place since the 18th century.
The human population has been growing exponentially since the mid-1800s.
In May 2008, the price of grain was pushed up severely by the increased cultivation of biofuels, the increase of world oil prices to over $140 per barrel ($880/m3),[131] global population growth,[132] the effects of climate change,[133] the loss of agricultural land to residential and industrial development,[134][135] and growing consumer demand in the population centres of China and India.[136][137] Food riots subsequently occurred in some countries.[138][139] However, oil prices then fell sharply. Resource demands are expected to ease as population growth declines, but it is unclear whether mass food wastage and rising living standards in developing countries will once again create resource shortages.[140][141]
David Pimentel, professor of ecology and agriculture at Cornell University, estimates that the sustainable agricultural carrying capacity for the United States is about 200 million people; its population as of 2015 is over 300 million.[142] In 2009, the UK government’s chief scientific advisor, Professor John Beddington, warned that growing populations, falling energy reserves and food shortages would create a “perfect storm” of shortages of food, water, and energy by 2030.[125][143] According to a 2009 report by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), the world will have to produce 70% more food by 2050 to feed a projected extra 2.3 billion people.[144]
The observed figures for 2007 showed an actual increase in absolute numbers of undernourished people in the world, with 923 million undernourished in 2007, versus 832 million in 1995.[145] The 2009 FAO estimates showed an even more dramatic increase, to 1.02 billion.[146]
7.2 Environmental impacts
Illegal slash-and-burn agriculture in Madagascar, 2010.
A number of scientists have argued that the current global population expansion and accompanying increase in resource consumption threatens the world’s ecosystem, as well as straining humanity’s ability to feed itself.[147][148] The InterAcademy Panel Statement on Population Growth, which was ratified by 58 member national academies in 1994, called the growth in human numbers “unprecedented”, and stated that many environmental problems, such as rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, global warming, and pollution, were aggravated by the population expansion.[149] Indeed, some analysts claim that overpopulation’s most serious impact is its effect on the environment.[18] At the time of the 1994 IAP statement, the world population stood at 5.5 billion, and lower-bound scenarios predicted a peak of 7.8 billion by 2050, a number that current estimates state will be reached in the late 2020s.
7.3 Population control
Main article: Human population control
India is anticipated to overtake China as the world’s most populous country by 2022.
Human population control is the practice of intervening to alter the rate of population growth. Historically, human population control has been implemented by limiting a region’s birth rate, by voluntary contraception or by government mandate. It has been undertaken as a response to factors including high or increasing levels of poverty, environmental concerns, and religious reasons. The use of abortion in some population control strategies has caused controversy,[150] with religious organizations such as the Roman Catholic Church explicitly opposing any intervention in the human reproductive process.[151]
The University of Nebraska publication Green Illusions argues that population control to alleviate environmental pressures need not be coercive. It states that “Women who are educated, economically engaged, and in control of their own bodies can enjoy the freedom of bearing children at their own pace, which happens to be a rate that is appropriate for the aggregate ecological endowment of our planet.”[152] The book Fatal Misconception by Matthew Connelly similarly points to the importance of supporting the rights of women in bringing population levels down over time.[153]
7.4 Overpopulation as a myth
The Population Research Institute (PRI), an anti-abortion, anti-contraception advocacy group, has criticised predictions of overpopulation and attendant resource scarcity, with some describing overpopulation as a myth.[154] The PRI argues that advances in agricultural, medical, and industrial technology have allowed global economic productivity to keep pace with rising populations despite Malthusian predictions to the contrary. PRI further says that family sizes are naturally declining worldwide due to higher living standards, increased availability of contraception and better economic opportunities for women. However, other commentators have described PRI’s arguments on overpopulation as deceptive.[155][156][157]
- Number of humans who have ever lived
Further information: Paleodemography
An estimate of the total number of humans who have ever lived was prepared by Carl Haub of the nonprofit Population Reference Bureau in 1995, and was subsequently updated in 2002 and 2011; the 2011 figure was approximately 107 billion.[20][21][158] Haub characterized this figure as an estimate that required “selecting population sizes for different points from antiquity to the present and applying assumed birth rates to each period”.[21] Several other scholarly estimates published in the first decade of the 21st century give figures ranging from approximately 100 billion to 115 billion.
8.1 Estimation methodologies
An accurate estimate of the number of humans who have ever lived is difficult to produce for numerous reasons. Firstly, the set of specific characteristics that define a “human” is a matter of definition, and it is open to debate which members of early Homo sapiens and earlier or related species of Homo to include in the estimate (see also Sorites paradox). Even if the scientific community reached a broad consensus regarding which characteristics distinguished human beings, it would be nearly impossible to pinpoint the time of their first appearance to even the nearest millennium, due to the scarcity of fossil evidence. However, the very small size of the world population in prehistoric times (as compared to its current size) makes this uncertainty of limited importance.
More importantly, robust population data only exist for the last two or three centuries. Until the late 18th century, few governments had ever performed an accurate census. In many early attempts, such as in Ancient Egypt and the Persian Empire, the focus was on counting merely a subset of the population for purposes of taxation or military service.[159] Thus, there is a significant margin of error when estimating ancient global populations.
Another critical factor for such an estimate is life expectancy, which depends significantly on infant mortality rates; these figures are very difficult to estimate for ancient times due to a lack of accurate records. Haub’s estimates suggest that around 40% of those who have ever lived did not survive beyond their first birthday.[21] Haub also stated that “life expectancy at birth probably averaged only about ten years for most of human history”.[21]